Persuasive Essay On Hunger - 1358 Words

Putting a Stop to Hunger There are many things that come to mind when thinking of an important issue that needs addressed nationally, globally, and locally. One issue that I could personally relate to eventually as a future educator, is the problem of hunger in our world. In our world, millions of people are starving and don’t know where their next meal is going to come from. In this essay, I will talk about this issue of hunger on the national, global, and local scale, the ways it is affecting our world, and the solutions I have found that could be beneficial in our community. To begin, we can start by looking at this issue of hunger globally. According to The Hunger Project, â€Å"Of the 815 million people suffering from chronic hunger, 98†¦show more content†¦(use capstone book) Although I only went into detail with the some of the causes of hunger, there are many more that come into play with this issue. As we wrap up hunger globally, here are a few statistics from food aid foundation to give you an idea of how much of the world are living in hunger. â€Å"The vast majority of the worlds hungry people live in developing countries, where 12.9 percent of the population is undernourished. To focus this on a specific area, Asia is the continent with the most hungry people - two thirds of the total. The percentage in southern Asia has fallen in recent years but in western Asia it has increased slightly. Along with Asia, the Sub-Saharan Africa region is the region with the highest prevalence (percentage of population) of hunger. One person in four there is undernourished.† In fixing hunger worldwide, there is one charity that tries to fight hunger. This charity is called, Action Against Hunger. This charity attempts to save lives by eliminating hunger through the prevention, detection, and treatment of malnutrition. To move the scale down to nationally, we focus on hunger in the United States. While researching the topic, I found a very resourceful website called, The New Face of Hunger. It begins by asking the questions, â€Å"Why are people malnourished in the richest country on Earth?† This is because Americans just cannot afford it. According to, National Public Radio, they believe that a bigShow MoreRelatedPersuasive Essay : Hunger Games772 Words   |  4 Pages Persuasive essay Hunger games, the time my mom left to cuba,and the right to the street of Memphis emplies that it is beneficial to be sheltered Rather than self governor. If we were all self governor most of us probably wouldn t be alive. In The hunger games by Suzanne collins, thirteen districts attempted to start a Revolution against the Capitol. They failed and district 13 was destroyed. An annual t elevised death match called the hunger games was created byRead MoreAnalysis of â€Å"The Singer Solution To World Poverty† Essay693 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿A Critique For â€Å"The Singer Solution To World Poverty† In the essay â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† philosopher Peter Singer addresses the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need. Singer believes that withholding income is the equivalence of letting a child starve to death. Therefore, Singer suggests the ethical thing to do to end world hunger is to give up everyday luxuries. Although donating a vast amount of money could help dyingRead MoreArgumentative Essays About Obesity1560 Words   |  7 Pagesis not the case. There are many programs out there that target America’s obese citizens. However, the main focus seems to be towards the younger generation. Childhood obesity seems to be escalating throughout the past few years. This may Is this Essay helpful? Join OPPapers to read more and access more than 350,000 just like it! get better grades be due to the convenience of foods high in fat. Teens and adolescents rely on things they can afford. Fast-food restaurants and low-cost candy is affordableRead MoreEssay on Check It985 Words   |  4 PagesJuly 28, 2012 English 0310 â€Å"What is Poverty?† Content a. How would you define the author’s purpose? Besides paragraph 15, in what parts of the essay is that purpose most apparent? I would define the author’s purpose is to express the life of a poor person and the views of others towards a poor individual. Besides paragraph 15, Parker’s purpose is most apparent in paragraph two and paragraph six. b. Why does the speaker address her audience directly, especially in paragraphs 4 and 10Read MoreRhetorical Analysis of Kristof792 Words   |  4 Pageswhich he takes one student a year on a reporting trip to help educate young people on the injustices taking place in third world countries. Nicholas does a great job developing his ethos in his essay and his prior experience in the field only adds to his credibility, which in turn makes his essay more persuasive. Aside from displaying and building a good ethos Nicholas also excelled in formulating an effective logos. Kristof shines in his development of his logos. He uses a plethora of different sourcesRead MoreRichard Rodriguez s Hunger Of Memory 974 Words   |  4 Pagesas the child of Mexican immigrants. According to his 1982 memoir, â€Å"Hunger of Memory†, Rodriguez uses his own observation â€Å"to argue that if the children of immigrants are to succeed in the United States, they must separate themselves from their home culture and immerse themselves in the English oriented atmosphere of the American school† (980). In â€Å"Aria†, Rodriguez has created an autobiographic essay of his childhood. In his essay, the author is against bilingual educators, who believe that childrenRead MoreThe Scarlet Letter, By Nathaniel Hawthorne Essay1287 Words   |  6 Pagesand this paper.† In December of my junior year in high school, I was assigned a persuasive essay on Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, The Scarlet Letter; it was my first academic essay of the year. My p revious experiences with academic writing were both stressful and unfulfilling; when the essay topic was announced, I felt only resentment and anger, I remembered my past tribulations. With my mother’s help, this essay was different; after I submitted it to the teacher, I possessed a new perspectiveRead MoreJonathan Swift Rhetorical Analysis706 Words   |  3 PagesWorldwide hunger and poverty has been a problem since the beginning of time. One place that has experienced such a tragedy was Ireland in the 1700’s. Most people were impoverished and poor and no one could find a way to fix the problem. One man, Jonathan Swift, believed that he had found the solution to the problem. His plan was to take children of these impoverished families and use them as a new food source. One would simply kill the child and then prepare it in whatever they choose. Although hisRead MoreThe Freedom Writers And Romeo And Juliet905 Words   |  4 PagesCentury Community Charter Middle Sc hool and Animo Inglewood High School. Every year in middle school and in High School english would be on my schedule, sometimes even with two different english classes a year. We read different writing pieces, wrote essays, and learned techniques that help us develop our reading and writing skills. In middle school the writing tasks were easier and funner than high school. We read books like the Diary of Anne Frank, The Freedom Writers, and Romeo and Juliet, that IRead MoreGenetically Modified Crops : Hope For Developing Countries?1543 Words   |  7 Pageslogical progression of thought for their argument, though providing the reader with external sources to analyze for their opinion might not be the most persuasive element, allowing the reader to choose for themselves displays a large amount of confidence the authors hold for their viewpoints. This confidence sets the tone for the remainder of the essay, as – trust us, trust scientists, trust the regulatory committees, and help your neighbor – is essentially what the final product states. There is

Cultural Diversity Is A Good Or A Bad Thing - 2326 Words

This researcher paper investigates if cultural diversity is a good or a bad thing in the workplace environment? At first, I am going to present my topic, by explaining the topic and giving the advantage and disadvantage of the topic. Second, I am going to summarize my sources. Third, I am going to present the point of view of two people that are in disaccord among the subject. In conclusion, by assimilating workers from culturally diverse backgrounds in their workforce, companies become much stronger. By integrating employees who have the same value system as the country where the company operates, it acquires knowledge and innovations it needs to be successful. Cultural diversity is an asset for companies Introduction â€Å"Cultural diversity is when differences in races, ethnicities, languages, nationalities, religion, and sexual orientation are represented within a community. A community is said to be culturally diverse if its residents include members of different groups. The community can be a country, region or city. Cultural diversity has become a big issue when is applied to the workplace† (Amado, 2015). Is cultural diversity a good or a bad thing in the workplace environment? By internationalizing a company, the company is confronted with different values and behaviors. Every culture has different expectations; the company needs to have the customary skills that will enable it to better understand the market. By integrating employees who have the sameShow MoreRelatedCultural Identity Reflection Paper1591 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿Cultural Identity Reflection Paper Who I am; my beliefs, values, morals, and views on diversity are shaped based upon my upbringing, the values within society, and the norms adopted by our culture. However, I can’t only thank these sources for whom I am; my own personal experiences and feelings have had a huge impact on my cultural views. My biases; I am aware of them (good), but they exist, and to some may seem bad. I want to take you on a journey inside my path to cultural identity. I thinkRead MoreDiversity And Discrimination In The Workplace1518 Words   |  7 PagesDiversity and Discrimination in the Workplace Diversity and discrimination are taken to have the same meaning to most people but this is not the case. Diversity is more in differ of certain things such as ideas and beliefs while discrimination is more in differ of things such as race, age, and gender. Yes, both are in differ of something but what is important to understand is that they are in differ of a variety of things. Yet it is sad but these qualities happen each and every day in the workplaceRead MoreWhat Makes Me Who I Am?851 Words   |  4 Pagespie graph in figure 2.1 of Ferdman (1995), I attempted to put my life in percentages basing them on what I felt I thought was most important. I immediately began to recognize who I am is a mixture of many things and from each I have built my perspective on life. I was well aware of my cultural affiliations and groups who I pertain to prior to this activity, but I was not aware of the input each has had on my life. As I created figure 2.1, I asked myself what about me is in my opinion the biggestRead MoreCultural Diversity and Diets1311 Words   |  6 PagesCultural Diversity and Diet Jacqueline Jones Week 2 Principles of Sociology Mitchell Swatez Different cultures around the world have their own types of customs that they are used to having. There are many types of diets that different cultures are used to having that unlike those of what we are used to here in the United States. In many cultures people eat toasted ants, frog legs, puppies, kittens, or raw monkey brains. I could never find myself eating none of the above, but this is naturalRead MoreDoes Ethnic Diversity Portend the Disuniting of America? Essay example1213 Words   |  5 PagesDoes Ethnic Diversity Portend the Disuniting of America? Whether or not â€Å"The First Universal Nation† of Ben Wattenberg (Buchanan 466) fixes its meaning? Despite it is in law, not all people have the same point-of -view about it in practice. George M. Fredrickson’s â€Å"Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective† and Patrick J. Buchanan’s â€Å"Deconstructing America† essays are typical exemplars. Fredrickson and Buchanan are famous politicians. â€Å"Race in US† is one of popular topicsRead MoreRacism And Racism859 Words   |  4 Pagesdoesn’t want to see how racist the world is, even though you can see racism through media, people killing people, and the criminal justice systems. The media has a great impact on the people, because they only broadcast news that gives fears and show how bad people of color and blacks are, and hardly reporting crimes that white people have committed. Definition Racism is the discrimination of people who are a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior, for example whites believeRead MoreIs Immigration A Problem?900 Words   |  4 PagesThere are some bad effects like greater poverty and education costs, but the good certainly outweighs the bad. There are many good outcomes from immigrants, but the top five are: economic gain, increase in cultural diversity, increase in the standard of living in the part of immigrant, a younger workforce, and skilled workers in need sectors. People say that immigrants take all our jobs and leave us with nothing, but in reality immigrants take the job that Americans feel they are too good to do. ForRead MoreDiversity in the Workpalce721 Words   |  3 PagesRunning Head: DIVERSITY, IN OUR Diversity in Our World, Good or Bad Renee Richardson Employee/Employer Relations Professor Bagwell December 3, 2008 Abstract Diversity is a wider concept than just ethnicity, race and gender. Other unique characteristics such as age, culture, style, education, religious beliefs, and sexual orientation also contribute to diversity. Promoting workforce diversity is difficultRead MoreThe Impact Of Diversity On The Workplace1609 Words   |  7 Pages3.2. Positive impacts The diversity has always been a concern for businesses and governments because the minority can feel sometimes left out and excluded for the employment sector. Therefore it has always been a priority for any government. They want to prove that they have been elected and are representing the entire population not just a group of people. Also businesses want to send a good image to their customers that they care about everyone even the minority. First of all, Kirton and GreeneRead MoreUnderstanding Of The Four Areas Of Cultural Intelligence1309 Words   |  6 PagesThe following paper will discuss the author’s understanding of the four areas of cultural intelligence (CQ): drive, knowledge, strategy and action. It will further describe how CQ specifically affects the author, their personal CQ knowledge and information that could increase this knowledge. Drive The drive capability of CQ is also considered motivation. It is a person’s â€Å"interests and confidence in functioning effectively in culturally diverse settings† (Livermore, 2011, p. 6). There are three

Week 9’s Final Free Essays

Part One †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Write an essay of at least 700 words. Comprehensive writing skills must be used. †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The First Amendment to the Constitution bars Congress from infringing on the freedom of speech of the citizenry of the United States. We will write a custom essay sample on Week 9’s Final or any similar topic only for you Order Now It does not prohibit private restrictions on speech. With this in mind, many universities have over the years instituted speech codes or have banned hate-speech. If you were in charge of a university what rules would you make for student conduct online? Explain your reasoning and support your answer with examples and other evidence. If our legal reality truly reflected our political rhetoric about liberty, Americans and especially American college and university students would be enjoying a truly remarkable freedom to speak and express controversial ideas at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Virtually every public official declares a belief in â€Å"freedom of speech. † Politicians extol the virtues of freedom and boast of America’s unique status as a nation of unfettered expression. Judges pay homage to free speech in court opinions. Even some fringe parties’ communists and fascists who would create a totalitarian state if they were in power have praised the virtues of the freedom they need for their survival. Few individuals speak more emphatically on behalf of freedom of speech and expression, however, than university administrators, and few institutions more clearly advertise their loyalty to this freedom than universities themselves. During the college application process, there is a very high probability that you received pamphlets, brochures, booklets, and catalogs that loudly proclaimed the university’s commitment to â€Å"free inquiry,† â€Å"academic freedom,† â€Å"diversity,† â€Å"dialogue,† and â€Å"tolerance. â€Å"You may have believed these declarations, trusting that both public and private colleges and universities welcome all views, no matter how far outside the mainstream, because they want honest difference and debate. Perhaps your own ideas were â€Å"unusual† or â€Å"creative. † You could be a liberal student in a conservative community, a religious student at a secular institution, or even an anarchist suffering under institutional regulations. Regardless of your background, you most likely saw college as the one place where you could go and hear almost anything—the one place where speech truly was free, where ideas were tried and tested under the keen and critical eyes of peers and scholars, where reason and values, not coercion, decided debate. Freedom and moral responsibility for the exercise of one’s freedom are ways of being human, not means adopted to achieve this or that particular point of view. Unfortunately, ironically, and sadly, America’s colleges and universities are all too often dedicated more to censorship and indoctrination than to freedom and individual self-government. In order to protect â€Å"diversity† and to ensure â€Å"tolerance,† university officials proclaim, views deemed hostile or offensive to some students and some persuasions and, indeed, some administrators are properly subjected to censorship under campus codes. In the pages that follow, you will read of colleges that enact â€Å"speech codes† that punish students for voicing opinions that simply offend other students, that attempt to force religious organizations to accept leaders who are hostile to the message of the group, that restrict free speech to minuscule â€Å"zones† on enormous campuses, and that teach students sometimes from their very first day on campus that dissent, argument, parody, and even critical thinking can be risky business. Simply put, at most of America’s colleges and universities, speech is far from free. College officials, in betraying the standards that they endorse publicly and that their institutions had, to the benefit of liberty, embraced historically, have failed to be trustees and keepers of something precious in American life. This  Guide  is an answer and, we hope, an antidote to the censorship and coercive indoctrination besetting our campuses. In these pages, you will obtain the tools you need to combat campus censors, and you will discover the true extent of your considerable free speech rights, rights that are useful only if you insist upon them. You will learn that others have faced and overcome the censorship you confront, and you will discover that you have allies in the fight to have your voice heard. The  Guide  is divided into four primary sections. This introduction provides a brief historical context for understanding the present climate of censorship. The second section provides a basic introduction to free speech doctrines. The third provides a series of real-world scenarios that demonstrate how the doctrines discussed in this  Guide  have been applied on college campuses. Finally, a brief conclusion provides five practical steps for fighting back against attempts to enforce coercion, censorship, and indoctrination. Part Two †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Write an essay of at least 700 words. Comprehensive writing skills must be used. †¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Between 1949 and 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was an FCC rule designed to provide â€Å"reasonable, although not necessarily equal† opportunities in presenting opposing viewpoints in radio broadcasting in order to avoid one-sided presentations. The practice was repealed under President Reagan as part of a wider deregulation effort. Do you think the Fairness Doctrine should be revived, revised, or left dead? Why? The  Fairness Doctrine  was a policy of the United States  Federal Communications Commission  (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of  broadcast licenses  to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission’s view, honest, equitable and balanced. The FCC decided to eliminate the Doctrine in 1987, and in August 2011 the FCC formally removed the language that implemented the Doctrine The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of  public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. The main agenda for the doctrine was to ensure that viewers were exposed to a diversity of viewpoints. In 1969 the  United States Supreme Court  upheld the FCC’s general  right  to enforce the Fairness Doctrine where channels were limited. But the courts did not rule that the FCC was  obliged  to do so. 3]  The courts reasoned that the scarcity of the broadcast spectrum, which limited the opportunity for access to the airwaves, created a need for the Doctrine. However, the proliferation of cable television, multiple channels within cable, public-access channels, and the Internet have eroded this argument, since there are plenty of places for ordinary individuals to make public comments on controversial issues at low or no cost. The Fairness Doctrine should not be confused with the  Equal Time  rule. The Fairness Doctrine deals with discussion of controversial issues, while the Equal Time rule deals only with political candidates. The Fairness Doctrine has been both defended and opposed on First Amendment grounds. Backers of the doctrine claim that listeners have the right to hear all sides of controversial issues. They believe that broad-casters, if left alone, would resort to partisan coverage of such issues. They base this claim upon the early history of radio. Opponents of the doctrine claim the doctrine’s â€Å"chilling effect† dissuaded broadcasters from examining anything but â€Å"safe† issues. Enforcement was so subjective, opponents argued, there was never a reliable way to determine before the fact what broadcasters could and could not do on the air without running afoul of the FCC. Moreover, they complain, print media enjoy full First Amendment protection while electronic media were granted only second-class status. I’ll be honest, I’d never even heard of the Fairness Doctrine until I read this question. After looking it up on a few different sites, I’d have to say I’m still not entirely sure whether or not I think it should be reinstated. I see both pro’s and cons to requiring licensed broadcast stations to present controversial public issues (which tends to apply mainly to political situations) in a fair, equal and honest way. I think this would create a more balanced source of rational discourse and  information  for the public on such issues and in this way serves the public interest. That being said, I think this is getting uncomfortably close to infringing upon freedom of the press and speech. I understand that the Fairness doctrine has the best of intentions and has even served us well in the past, But often, even good legislation leads to increased powers and control for government. No matter how many checks and balances our government has, It only takes one government official’s loose interpretation of a law in order to justify abusing his office and encroaching up the basic rights our constitution grants us. How to cite Week 9’s Final, Papers